(January 27, 2015 at 4:45 pm)bob96 Wrote: One issue I have with evolution is the interpretation of skulls. There is enormous variation of size and shape in the human skull.
For example, look at the following comparisons:
Modern Aboriginal vs Slavic skull [1]
"its morphology (the Modern Aboriginal skull) could be described as archaic" (Jim Vanhollebeke - Paleoanthropologist)
Neanderthal vs Homosapien skull
Note the protruding eye ridge and 'bun' are similar features in both Neanderthal and modern Aboriginal skulls.
To claim that Neanderthal was a less evolved human is simply not objective science.
So, in other words, your problem is your lack of education and understanding of comparative anatomy.
Thanks for clarifying.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.