You seemed to miss the point, and in the interim proved my point. You quoted Bart Ehrman's authority as a scholar, and then spent this entire post discrediting him. Nowhere did I say that Bart Ehrman is right. I said you quoted him on the thing you agree with him on without looking at his entire body of work. So, I ask again---what is the difference between the quote you quoted and the quotes I quoted?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---