RE: A simple challenge for atheists
January 30, 2015 at 12:02 pm
(This post was last modified: January 30, 2015 at 12:03 pm by FatAndFaithless.)
(January 30, 2015 at 12:00 pm)SteveII Wrote:(January 30, 2015 at 11:39 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Your "Z" set isn't evidence, the point about which my above post laments. I'll keep using this muslim example, because it so easily demonstrates what you seem intent on ignoring.
If a muslim replied with his own "Z" set of evidence, his koran and the surrounding historical figures/writings/events/miracles, how on earth could you refute him?
You'd just be stuck repeating "I believe my Bible's claims, therefore it's evidence for Chrsitianity", and he'd be stuck repeating "I believe my Koran's claims, therefore it's evidence for Islam."
For your God's sake, you can't be this thick.
You don't get to redefine the word evidence. What you mean is proof. That is not the same thing.
If you are asking me to refute some specific evidence that Islam has that Christianity is wrong, that would be relevant--please be specific.
No, you unbelievable idiot, I'm not redefining anything.
I'm asking you to take one moment and imagine a situation in which a Muslim comes to you with his "evidence" that Islam is true, and uses the exact same reasoning and justifications that you have been using, just with the muslim versions of all your claims of "evidence".
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson