(January 30, 2015 at 12:00 pm)SteveII Wrote:(January 30, 2015 at 11:39 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Your "Z" set isn't evidence, the point about which my above post laments. I'll keep using this muslim example, because it so easily demonstrates what you seem intent on ignoring.
If a muslim replied with his own "Z" set of evidence, his koran and the surrounding historical figures/writings/events/miracles, how on earth could you refute him?
You'd just be stuck repeating "I believe my Bible's claims, therefore it's evidence for Chrsitianity", and he'd be stuck repeating "I believe my Koran's claims, therefore it's evidence for Islam."
For your God's sake, you can't be this thick.
You don't get to redefine the word evidence. What you mean is proof. That is not the same thing.
If you are asking me to refute some specific evidence that Islam has that Christianity is wrong, that would be relevant--please be specific.
That's it. You can call me Miss Dictionary from now on.
ev·i·dence
noun \ˈe-və-dən(t)s, -və-ˌden(t)s\
: something which shows that something else exists or is true
: a visible sign of something
: material that is presented to a court of law to help find the truth about something
proof
noun \ˈprüf\
: something which shows that something else is true or correct
: an act or process of showing that something is true
mathematics : a test which shows that a calculation is correct
From Merriam-Webster.