RE: Q about arguments for God's existence.
February 1, 2015 at 12:19 pm
(This post was last modified: February 1, 2015 at 12:22 pm by robvalue.)
If you say you believe something, and you want to be taken seriously, then you should be able to give evidence and/or reasons why. If you don't believe something, then again you can explain why you don't, which is normally simply that there is not enough evidence. If you don't care whether your beliefs make sense, then there's nothing to even discuss.
A claim of knowledge rather than belief is obviously stronger and will always require a burden of proof.
You could be considered irrational for not believing something given conclusive evidence (such as evolution) just as much as believing something with no evidence (religion).
A claim of knowledge rather than belief is obviously stronger and will always require a burden of proof.
You could be considered irrational for not believing something given conclusive evidence (such as evolution) just as much as believing something with no evidence (religion).
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum