(February 16, 2015 at 1:15 pm)Gavin Duffy Wrote: Spirituality (practically a neologism in modern times), I believe, while certainly still tainted with ambiguity in many circles has less to do with any supernaturally deduced doctrine of belief, but more to do with an awareness of everyday internal subjectivity. It is a lift off from Eastern philosophy (Hara Krishna, Tibetan Budhism etc.) and promotes things like meditation (a practice i fervently endorse) the sanctity of life and 'the present'.I still don't get. "Awareness of everyday interal subjectivity" isn't really a working definition for me. My awareness that my thoughts are my own and might not represent reality, just like everyone else, doesn't convince me to do mediation or considers the present important. This awareness doesn't lead me to any other conclusions than we can be wrong about a lot of things.
Quote:As for morality, I am reluctant to posit my position for ethical reasons, however my original thesis proposal suggests that while it is inherently difficult to carve out universal truths within the moral topography, organised monotheism does not retain a monopoly as is so frequently thought among the religious (particularly related to social in-group tendencies).
My morality comes primarly from empathy. Empathy is the driving force that makes me act. My understanding that actions have consequences guides my empathy on what actions I should take to result the best possible outcome.