@ Ent: "People like me"? You're not listening. Pol Pot = proven immoral acts. God = no proof of immoral acts. If you are arguing with Christianity and it's construct, then you are arguing that God who is good is then not good by Christianity's own terms. Because it doesn't matter what slant you put on the interpretation: what we are discussing isn't your interpretation. I think we've circled this particular argument enough times with you repeating the same accusation without facing the answer given.
@ Evie: those assertions, to be bare, would have to be logically unsupported, which isn't true.
@ Evie: those assertions, to be bare, would have to be logically unsupported, which isn't true.
