RE: Do we expect too much from human reason?
March 6, 2015 at 9:43 am
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2015 at 9:45 am by Ben Davis.)
(March 5, 2015 at 12:11 pm)comet Wrote: Thoughtage point is that far right and far left have similar and predictable traits. This is a "truth" that really is empirical. We can argue it till we are blue in the face. The fact remains, list personality traits of people and we have not only an overlap but a large element of predictability. We don't have to like it. Some bitches are even afraid of it. It doesn't change the validity of the observation.Actually, Thoughtage's point is that the 'trust' that rationalist, naturalist atheists have in 'human reason' is equivalent to the 'faith' that theists have in their deities and since faith is an unreliable tool, human reason can be dismissed therefore as a valid method of identifying the truth about the nature of reality. His position is patently false and easily rebutted. Further, he claims that all atheists are rationalist naturalists and subject to his analysis of faith/human reason therefore atheism can be dismissed as an unreliable worldview. He uses this equivalence as a rationale for distancing himself from the label 'atheist'. This is also an unachievable stretch for his position and rebutted as easily as his first point.
I'm not sure what you're going on about.
Sum ergo sum