(March 9, 2015 at 12:53 pm)robvalue Wrote: Sure, I'm very happy to say that. I believe that there is no god interacting with our reality, at least. I feel that the complete lack of any evidence you would expect from such a presence or interaction is reasonable for such a belief, along with our scientific explanations doing a great job and not needing such assumptions.
That's how I live my life. But if it came to a formal debate, I'd just stick with weak atheism as I then have no burden of proof at all. I'm not the one making crazy talk.
But even if one said that they believed God did not exist, the burden of proof would still solely lie on the theist to convince us that God at least likely exists and, therefore, the belief that he doesn't is unwarranted.