(March 11, 2015 at 11:07 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(March 11, 2015 at 12:00 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: Ah, the swiftly moving target that is Huggy's argumentative style.
You'll find yourself making an argument about how the fucking moon didn't randomly move 190,000 miles closer to the Earth in a thread about Jesus' marriage.
You can't be serious...
Esquilax is the one that brought up the flood.
If I don't respond I'm dodging, if I do respond, I'm derailing the thread. You guys are a joke.
Now brakeman is whining about me not responding to his post on evolution, I guess that will be my fault too, right?
The changing topics is not so much the issue. It's the rabbit hole that each change in topic leads us down, and the timing of said topic switch.
The fact that when you know you're wrong, your approach is to delve into things like the definition of the word "intimate" when the meaning was clear, or a cherry picked definition of a double negative, instead of sticking to the topic. Because you know you're wrong.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
