(March 12, 2015 at 1:02 pm)Faith No More Wrote:(March 12, 2015 at 8:47 am)ChadWooters Wrote: And I suppose you have a litmus test for No True Atheist...You're just incensed by the idea that maybe atheism isn't as compelling as YOU think it is.
Atheism is only compelling when it's reached for the right reason, and if this was all the evidence he needed, I don't think he was as rational and logical as he thinks he was.
His conclusion is extremely self-centered given that God was inactive when it came to stopping the molestation, but all of sudden god feels the need to intervene when it comes to bringing him into the fold by having a little girl speak up about abuse.
This is just another case of ego overriding rationality and a man claiming to be rational but willing to abandon reason at a moment's notice.
After all the Christians who've been here over the years and all they've shown about the way God works, you're still as clueless as the day you were born. Blind might be a strong enough word for the atheist here, let's try ignorantly, selfishly blind, just for starters. A man finds happiness and gives help to a little girl that humanity let down and all you can do is be sullen.
GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
