The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This

[Esquilax]

That's all you've got?

I'm explaining what the Bible Defines as a species. Every seed must bring forth of it's own "KIND". This simply means, as long as fertile offspring are able to be produced, they are the same species.

Which is why it's nonsense to assume the Bible states Noah took two of every single animal in the world aboard the ark, when it clearly states he took two of each species, big difference.

The Bible is not a science textbook.

Dumbfuck.

Yeah, this is another one of those utterly idiotic points from Huggy, where he uses a non-standard definition and then concludes that the definition he wants to use is the only definition there is, so therefore that's also the definition the scientists are using.

It's completely vapid, but there's worse to see here too, because like all creationists, Huggy has completely failed to provide a comprehensive definition of what a "kind" is, as it applies to biological organisms. Without a means of determining the bounds of each "kind" we have no way of arguing back against this- utterly insubstantial- long streak of piss of a claim, but then, that's what all creationists want when they say this; they purposefully don't define it so it can mean whatever they need at the time to shift the goalposts away from the conclusion of evolution.

Dishonest in the extreme, but then, what isn't, of Huggy's fumbling attempts at discourse?

(bold mine, showing what you quote mined and what the context was)

Notice how everyone else wanted to go for a fission weapon (H-Bomb) and Teller wanted to go for a fusion weapon (Atomic.) He was the only one. So he produced equations that showed that the weapon that everyone else was pursuing would destroy the world.

So this man made a claim that people tested and proved wrong (you know, science), and you want to make it out like all of "science" thought the fission weapon would destroy the earth.

You dishonest troll.

Predicted response: "But he was still a scientist, and he was also wrong, right? Yes or no."

Because it's not about an accurate representation of reality, its about safeguarding whatever Huggy has said in the past so that he never has to admit wrongdoing!