(March 18, 2015 at 2:29 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(March 18, 2015 at 2:06 pm)Esquilax Wrote: Do you always go by definitions that are contextually incorrect when discussing things? Why do you think that's at all acceptable?
I've always made it clear in what context I'm in, This isn't the first time I've explained sort/kind. You guys really need to remove the 30 day limit on threads that way people could just be referred back to a thread where this has already been discussed to death.
The strange thing is, you act like you have amnesia and this is the first time this topic has been discussed.
I don't care what context you're speaking in, I care about the contextually appropriate meaning of words. You are discussing evolution, and so the honest thing to do is use the definitions of words as they can be applied to evolution and, more broadly, the biological sciences. You need to be discussing evolution according to what evolution is defined as, and I can't believe this is some controversial statement to you. You don't get to just decide you're going to use a different contextual definition of a word, and then demand that everyone else has to use the same definition.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!