RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
March 19, 2015 at 1:10 pm
(This post was last modified: March 19, 2015 at 1:14 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 19, 2015 at 1:04 pm)Esquilax Wrote:i'm quoting the question and the ANSWER to the question, the statemen of "that's an odd question" is irrelevant"(March 19, 2015 at 12:59 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Hah, and he didn't even include the first sentence of my response in his signature.
But seriously, at what point is this kind of blatant dishonesty against the rules?
Well, I'd suggest that Huggy get acquainted with the rules, wherein quote mining is definitely not okay. No matter how minor he seems to think it is, it's such a petty example of it that I'd be pretty happy calling it trolling too, and coming down on it.
not to mention the rules clearly state you can quote someone in part, you just can't MODIFY the quote.
Quote:Quoting Others Accurately
When using the quote function to quote other members, you may quote in whole or in part, but may not change the quoted text in any way.
(March 19, 2015 at 12:57 pm)Norman Humann Wrote: Huggy, it's possible to count to two on one hand, you know.
That was mainly for those who claim I can't admit when in wrong, besides rob can add that example to his count and maybe we can get to two hands.