RE: The argument against God
January 19, 2009 at 12:10 pm
(This post was last modified: January 19, 2009 at 12:47 pm by leo-rcc.)
If you make your definition of a deity vague enough there is not much you can argue against, but there isn't much left to be called a deity either. The thing is, you are gnostic therefore believe in some deity. You have to be able to define what it is you actually believe, otherwise why believe it in the first place? We cant make claims of disbelieving things existing if it is not defined what it is.
As for what makes the the atheistical perception of reality right? I don't think many atheist claim to know what is the absolute correct perception of reality, but we base our perception and belief on what is gathered through testable and verifiable evidence, and not on some vague notion and hunches.
As for what makes the the atheistical perception of reality right? I don't think many atheist claim to know what is the absolute correct perception of reality, but we base our perception and belief on what is gathered through testable and verifiable evidence, and not on some vague notion and hunches.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
