The argument against God

[DD_8630]

I think you have missed the point of the thread. I was looking for an argument against a diety in general, not mine in particular.

Which again begs the question: what is a 'deity'? How can we formulate an argument against its existence if we don't even know what it is?

What makes the atheistical perception of reality right?

Nothing, since there is no such "atheistical [sic] perception".

Theism affirms the existence of deities, while atheism does not. Atheism affirms nothing, claims nothing, posits nothing.

If a group of people claimed that there existed magic gnomes inside the roots of trees, I daresay you would be sceptical: you'd say "Hang on, why on Earth should I believe you?".

That is the atheist. He does not affirm the existence of deities (and, generally, he doesn't affirm their non-existence either).

---

The thing is, you are gnostic therefore believe in some deity.

That means he's a theist, not a gnostic :p