RE: More Shit For Creatards To Swallow
April 13, 2015 at 1:13 am
(This post was last modified: April 13, 2015 at 1:14 am by robvalue.)
I remember this one "defence" against this sort of thing, I won't say who said it.
They said that our dating methods cannot accurately measure anything to more than 50,000 years. Therefor, nothing can actually be more than 50,000 years old.
Obviously the premise is nonsense, but I couldn't even get them to see the flaw in their "logic", that the age of something does not depend on our ability to measure its age.
They said that our dating methods cannot accurately measure anything to more than 50,000 years. Therefor, nothing can actually be more than 50,000 years old.
Obviously the premise is nonsense, but I couldn't even get them to see the flaw in their "logic", that the age of something does not depend on our ability to measure its age.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
