RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 6, 2015 at 4:34 am
(This post was last modified: June 6, 2015 at 4:36 am by robvalue.)
No one is denying there wasn't anyone he could have been based on. It's just a level of how much he was based on someone. Not very much is the answer, somewhere between 0 and 1%, and we're splitting the hairs about where exactly between those limits.
Err... apparently when you say it is. I'm just evaluating the evidence to the best of my ability.
Poor Jewish preacher? Horrible death? You're trying to emotionally manipulate me into agreement? I've had enough I think.
Err... apparently when you say it is. I'm just evaluating the evidence to the best of my ability.
Poor Jewish preacher? Horrible death? You're trying to emotionally manipulate me into agreement? I've had enough I think.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum