RE Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 7, 2015 at 3:37 pm
(This post was last modified: June 7, 2015 at 3:39 pm by Pyrrho.)
(June 7, 2015 at 3:13 pm)TheMessiah Wrote:(June 7, 2015 at 3:11 pm)Pyrrho Wrote: That is a good question. This is not his first thread that deals with this topic:
A strange but curious question: if you had a time machine...
The arguments are pretty much the same, over and over again. I guess he figures that doing the same thing again will give him a different result than it did before.
I suppose, just like calling someone a misogynist over and over again would have a different result.
You seem to be confused about the quote function. My post in which I stated that you are a misogynist was quoted over and over again. That was not me writing it over and over, that was people using the quote function. You might want to read up on how message boards like this one function.
You also are confused about the purpose of the post. It was a response to someone else, not to you. I did not expect to convince you of anything with it.
You might also want to work on your skills with links, as yours does not take one to any particular post of mine, but to page 14 of a thread.
You really are exposing yourself to ridicule with the things you state. Of course I do not expect you to stop doing that.
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.