RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 9, 2015 at 2:23 am
(This post was last modified: June 9, 2015 at 2:24 am by robvalue.)
I've aware of all the evidence, I believe. There isn't much, and it isn't good. The extrapolations aren't convincing. A historian still needs to explain why they come to any particular conclusion, and if I think the reasoning is flawed then I reject it. Sure, that's just my opinion. All we can have is opinions, it's not like science where we can actually test any of them.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum