Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[Pyrrho]

That is a good question.  This is not his first thread that deals with this topic:

A strange but curious question: if you had a time machine...

The arguments are pretty much the same, over and over again.  I guess he figures that doing the same thing again will give him a different result than it did before.

I am late to this thread, and I have noticed this pattern with the OP too.  He reiterates the same point over and over.  It is a    What is the saying?  Oh yes, "Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results = the definition of insanity.

Yes.  But recognizing a pattern does nothing to prevent it from occurring again.  I expect another thread on the subject of whether there was a historical Jesus or not within a few months of this one being abandoned.  And I expect the arguments to be pretty much the same. It is not as if it is likely that anyone is going to dig up a new document in the next couple of months.