RE: The right to mis-define oneself
June 14, 2015 at 6:47 pm
(This post was last modified: June 14, 2015 at 6:48 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(June 14, 2015 at 6:20 pm)bennyboy Wrote: lol @ the DoJ as our source of moral correctness.
I'm not talking about morality, I'm talking about the definition of sexual assault. Surely you're intelligent enough to discern that, and are being deliberately obtuse here in order to avoid simply admitting error.
(June 14, 2015 at 6:20 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Okay, let's stop playing semantics, because I don't need to draw an equivalence to rape anyway. I posed a simple question: do you or do you not think that a last-minute reveal is likely to cause trauma in many men? Let's forget about the rape "analogy," and look at this in terms of assault. Yes or no: do you believe a significant % of men will be traumatized by this experience?
Your withdrawing your stupid comparison without acknowledging its falsity is noted. I had thought you were better than that. I suppose I was wrong.
To answer your question: no. Are you so sensitive that you'd have lingering psychological issues because you saw a woman with a penis? Do you have numbers?