The right to mis-define oneself

[Thumpalumpacus]

Okay, now we're getting somewhere.  You're saying I'm an exception-- that I have psychological issues that would cause me to feel traumatized by a late-reveal penis in a sexual situation.

No, that's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying no to "do you or do you not think that a last-minute reveal is likely to cause trauma in many men", which is a different thing altogether.

 I think you're lying in saying that a lot of men wouldn't be traumatized, because it's so obvious to me that they would be.

I'm not sure who died and vacated the position of spokesman for all men, but I'm pretty sure you ain't the new nominee. I really don't care what you think is "obvious" based on your own personal feelings, because that is simply you projecting your own feelings onto other men.

 

So let's go to teh interwebs and see if we can collect a sample.  But it's possible I'm wrong.  Maybe I'm just a homophobe or I have some kind of complex.  1, 2, 3, 4. . . I declare a link war!

I've already linked supporting my point that finding out your date is trans is not the equivalent to rape, which is the point I've been making all along. You lost this war before it started. You made an idiotic assertion and don't have the spine to admit error.

It's cool, I've seen thousands like you online over the years. The only surprise to me is that I had you pegged wrongly; I had thought that as a reasonable person, you could admit error when it has been demonstrated. Instead, you assert lying on the part of your interlocutor. It's all good ... but I know better about you, now.

(For the record, I haven't called you homophobic, or made any other insinuations about your character. I don't want any reader thinking otherwise due to what you posted above.)

[...]because a failure to disclose would be likely to cause trauma, or at least intense discomfort. [...]

Once more, backpedalling without acknowledgement. You should own your mistakes.