(January 29, 2009 at 9:49 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(January 29, 2009 at 12:56 pm)bozo Wrote: Adrian, apologies I didn't phrase my question properly ( I'd had a few drinks and it was late ).I agree, different questions demand different ways of looking at it. I think I would still kill the one "goody" in the case above, simply because there could still be productive things the "baddies" could do (and after all, you let me put my own interpretations on "good" and "bad").
What if the one strapped to the track was the " goody " and all the people on the train were real " baddies "? Put your own interpretation on good and bad.
My view is that the answer to the question is how you view the end result. Some results will justify the means, others won't, depending on your own view.
Oh, and let's try not to turn this forum into a place where one can simply throw an insult and walk away from the show. It's far more beneficial for both parties if you continue to "duke it out" or agree to disagree.
Adrian, I know you have a job to do BUT I think Leo is man enough to look after himself! My reference to being an eel ( if he were animal ) was intended as a bit of fun...eels are slippy things. I felt Leo was being a tad slippery.
I like to think Leo is not mortally offended by our lively debate.
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
