All you've done so far is reaffirm the Big Bang model. I don't see how you can honestly get from there to "therefore God" without major fiat assertions.
Here's a little food for thought for you. You cited Stephen Hawking, quite rightly as an authority on the subject. Yet he is an atheist who has repeatedly said that no gods were necessary for creating the Universe. Why do you suppose that is, that he remains unconvinced by the argument that you're advocating?
Here's a little food for thought for you. You cited Stephen Hawking, quite rightly as an authority on the subject. Yet he is an atheist who has repeatedly said that no gods were necessary for creating the Universe. Why do you suppose that is, that he remains unconvinced by the argument that you're advocating?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
