Answers needed

[robvalue]

Louis: I apologise for any upset. But from my point of view, I asked for a definition. So I assumed you were giving me a definition. Do you have an actual definition?

If you were changing the question to, "Do you believe in something which has evidence for it as long as you believe in it"... that is a very strange question. Please feel free to update either the definition or the question I can't properly answer a question if I don't know what I'm being asked. Surely you can appreciate that? I mean, do you believe in ggljgldjdkfhfkjfffff?

I suppose what you are saying is that if there was evidence, that evidence would manifest itself through nature. Is that right? That is more reasonable, although it's also a tautology since there is currently no other way we could get evidence. So we're left with "a supernatural force". Do I believe in a supernatural force? I have no opinion. I have no idea at all if anything exists beyond what we consider nature or not. Science, and myself, can by definition never know anything about it.

You don't have to address my concerns if they are outside the scope of your questions. In which case, I'll just stick with my previous answers I'm afraid I must bring in fallacies when they are being made, in order to further conversation. If that's not to your liking, then feel free to ignore my responses.