RE: Overpopulation: You get to cast the deciding vote.
July 11, 2015 at 11:27 pm
(This post was last modified: July 12, 2015 at 12:57 am by Excited Penguin.)
Parkers Tan Wrote:
Yes, one need be, at least if one is sure as hell he's right about something, like you are, for one.
Parkers Tan Wrote:
College level knowledge is not good enough to not make any mistakes when talking about such things[as we're bound to do]. All I'm saying is let's drop it down a notch on the whole assurance thing you've got going on here, eh?
Parkers Tan Wrote:
I'm sure it does, as it does to me. I never said otherwise. Check twice, before you reply to something.
Parkers Tan[hide Wrote:
You don't agree that the government is there to watch our backs, so to say?
Do you think maybe that it's there to stab us in the back?/sarcasm
Parkers Tan Wrote:Oh, good, you don't!
![Popcorn Popcorn](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
It wasn't meant as such. It was meant as a joke. I guess you missed it. It's called tongue-in-cheek humour. I hear only some people can get up their mantras* for this. wink wink.
* I know, but it has such an apparent visual component to it: like it's some sort of shield. Idk why. But I love playing with words like that. There's also the original sanskrit meaning to it: a thought. So that, combined with the eng expr give rise to, is a perfect match.
Parkers Tan Wrote:
I never implied such a thing either. Would you stop that! It's starting to bug me.