I just read it. It pretty much mirrors my own thoughts. I wouldn't call what he wrote, "A religion for the non-religious" though. It's written more like a self-help guide.
I think the author is spot-on regarding the fact that logic utterly destroys all the religions people have invented but also demands the possibility of a deistic or pantheistic type of being. I don't even think of speculation about such a being as in the realm of religion, anymore than speculation about any other facet of the universe that is for the time being, completely outside our circle of knowledge. To me, religion = assuming something is true on the basis of faith.
I think the author is spot-on regarding the fact that logic utterly destroys all the religions people have invented but also demands the possibility of a deistic or pantheistic type of being. I don't even think of speculation about such a being as in the realm of religion, anymore than speculation about any other facet of the universe that is for the time being, completely outside our circle of knowledge. To me, religion = assuming something is true on the basis of faith.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein