(September 17, 2020 at 3:45 pm)Drich Wrote: you dont even know how deep the evil goes on your side.. that's the thing with infanticide... at somepoint someone in authority will stop lying to himself about what abortion is, and will ask what is the difference between late term and post term abortion...Fox Noise lies. CNS is rated as a highly questionable news source. Reputable news sources please.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/virginia...-own-state
https://cnsnews.com/news/article/emily-w...ld-proceed
“In this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” Northam said. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.” in short the baby is born, and left to die due to exposure to cold temps/neglect/starvation after birth.. but this bill is based on the government nor any man being able to tell a woman what she can do with her body.. which i guess in liberal speak viable/birthed baby. the fact people want this option and it was even consider show how sheer evil has taken the hearts of those on the far left. this should never even be considered let alone voted on and signed into law.
Quote:again god is not bound by your rules of morality. what is ok for a man in situation a will be different for a man living in situation b. God is not an inflexible monster. he doesnt give us any more than what is possible for us to deal with...
I don't believe in "relative morality". I think relative morality is, in fact, amorality. Believing that morality is relative to the time and culture in which you live is essentially saying that morality is nothing more than a set of arbitrary rules, which is amorality.
Instead of advocating for relative morality (amorality), your god could have done a better job of creating this world, set down a standard set of universal moral principles and made a world where living up to them was possible. Instead, according to your own words, your god opted for a shifting standard of morality based on time and culture.
Your god is amoral and inconsistent and thus has no credibility in saying what is right or wrong.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
