The Middle Ages Was the Best We Ever Had

[Spectrum]

I am no history major, but based on my readings, I have concluded that the Middle Ages was not nearly as efficient as it could have been. I think a lot of erratic beliefs hindered it; there was a lot of poor leadership. I am aware of its fruit: universities, algebra, etc. However, I find it difficult to believe that, overall, the Middle Ages can educate us in how to construct an effective, healthy society.

Here lately, I was having a political discussion with some people on Facebook. We threw around ideas and such. Then, I stated my dislike for the Middle Ages (it was pertinent, I assure you). Afterwards, someone told me I am incorrect; the Middle Ages is deserving of high praise. I asked him, "Why?". In reply, he stated that Julius Evola (whom I know little of) considered the 12th century-Middle Ages era to be the pinnacle of traditional (Julius loves Tradition and Transcendence) Western civilization. He didn't explain further, unfortunately. His reasoning was simply that the this era was a perfect example of a great traditional society. Cathedrals and scholasticism being its major contributions.

I am not so ignorant as to say that one era is better than the other, simply because it proceeds or precedes another. I simply disbelieve in Julius Evola's conclusion. I think the guy focuses too much on spirituality and tradition, as those seem to be extensions of a civilization (in other words, they are flexible variables). From what I know, Evola nearly worships this time period.

What is your opinion? Is this era worthy of high praise? Is Evola correct, and should I retract my initial statement?