(December 2, 2018 at 10:33 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(December 2, 2018 at 5:16 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: First, I kindly thank you for taking the time to post this, and I pretty much agree with everything in it. Actually I think it's mostly things put in high school science texts as well. At least from when I was in school.
The problem still exists though of clockwise rotations vs those that are counter-clockwise. Rotation directly affects energy displacement. Just like if you turn on a fan, the direction the blade turns is going to directly determine where the energy transfers to. This also makes a fan super efficient, because you can use it to add or remove heat energy, giving it to the ability to raise or lower temperatures. It becomes a bit more complicated with planets because there is also supposed to have been an expanse, previously to or during the initial rotational sequence. Even a pointed object is going to have rotation, but more so a sphere, due to the same amount of mass having greater surface area in that form vs something else. Then there is the issue of where the energy came from, and what events caused this, but since we have a gap with 4 planets in between those two planets, I think it's safe to say that there had to be at least two anomalies to explain this, or at least understand the time frame in which both of those planets had their orbit established and how it happened (maybe it had something to do with their alignment when the anamoly took place in contrast to the other planets).
This information is beyond high school; at most there a student will get this information in passing.
And, so....do you have a single scientific citation to support your claims, concerns, etc? In other words, of the 2K+ astronomers in the United States and the thousands more across the World, is there anyone at all whom you can point to who agrees with you??
Most of that I learned in high school. Not all though.
As far as citations and who agrees with me, well I dunno. I didn't ask them. But I doubt that any of them, unless one is a whack job, will disagree on my statements on planetary rotation. It's conclusive that two rotate in the opposite direction as the others. So now we need to explain why their behavior is such and how it got that way. Your answer so far has "randomness." If you would like, you can pick an astronomer of your choice, and I'll contact them to see if they'll do a written statement on it and if they agree that is was randomness or if it should be assumed that another explanation is necessary and/or probable. Deal? If so, let me know which astronomer I should contact. I also won't mention names or ideology of either of us when I ask them. That way they can answer without bias or prejudice.