(July 11, 2012 at 1:09 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(July 11, 2012 at 1:06 am)Jeffonthenet Wrote: From this, atheism doesn't necessary follow. At best it would be agnosticism that follows.
Somehow I doubt you understand the difference, or why they are not mutually exclusive.
I hate getting bogged down by definitions. My point was that if there is an absence of evidence of God it doesn't mean you are necessarily justified in believing that there is no God. If you are, please explain why.