RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 6:37 am
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2012 at 6:38 am by Reforged.)
(July 21, 2012 at 6:28 am)catfish Wrote:Sorry "Lot" and his daughters. Easy mistake. Lot is son of Abraham.(July 21, 2012 at 6:24 am)Zen Badger Wrote: What part of the bible would you like to discuss?
For the record, even though a lifelong atheist I'd always assumed that a book that so many millions had supposedly based their lives on had to make sense. Afterall who would base their life on nonsense?
Then I started to read it.
You pick, the OP started with a strawman and and ad-hom which I addressed and not one person has refuted.
Start with why a person would claim Christians think sex and/or nudity is wrong if you want a challenge. Or conceded the points I brought up and think of something else.
(July 21, 2012 at 6:27 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Well the fact he'd been quite active up until that point making the effort to destroy a whole town and Abrahams wife would seem to indicate he didn't mind two girls having incestial relations with their father too much... even though the Bible states hes against that kind of thing.
Please, explain.
You strike me as one of these dumb sons-of-bitches who think they can come on here without having read the Bible cover to cover first and think they can attack it. You're gonna have to be direct, I'm not wasting my time unless you can show me where your ideas come from.
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without eveidence"
Next...
All the known translations of the passage are right here, they all basically say the same thing:
http://bible.cc/genesis/19-32.htm
Of course, if you knew the Bible you wouldn't of needed me to get it for you which in itself is damning testament to your lack of knowledge on it really, isn't it?
Anyway, knock yourself out. Let me know what you think. :-)
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.