RE: Mt. Soledad cross ordered to be taken down
July 28, 2015 at 9:01 am
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2015 at 9:01 am by Mister Agenda.)
Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:Brian37 Wrote:On private property, even if you can see it from a public road, like a church, that is one thing. But public memorials on public land should be neutral.Can you give one example of a neutral public memorial on public land? It seems that all of them are offensive to some segment of the population.
Offense isn't the measure, Constitutionality is. A monument could be extremely offensive to almost everyone and still be Constitutionally sound.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.