(December 13, 2013 at 10:19 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:I would actually go for that. You can erect your crosses as long as I can erect a giant Sigil of Baphomet or a Satanic cross next to it.(December 13, 2013 at 6:27 pm)MarxRaptor Wrote: This was built with public funds? I don't support that.For Pete's sake! Read the article. It was built with private funds. Even I would oppose taxpayer funding. The issue is that of the free exercise of the people's religious beliefs on property owned by the people. The government of the people owns the sidewalk too. Are you going to ban people from wearing religious symbols on the publicly owned streets or in publicly owned buildings too? Religious groups have just as much right as any other group to use public property on which displays of conscience are displayed. Go get you secular humanist manifesto, or whatever floats your boat, carve it on a monument and place it next to the cross. Issue solved. Freedom preserved. The alternative is just censorship, plain and simple.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 9:32 am
Thread Rating:
Mt. Soledad cross ordered to be taken down
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)