RE: Christians, what is your VERY BEST arguments for the existence of God?
April 4, 2010 at 12:16 am
Being incorporeal doesn't prevent something from having parts, just as long as those parts are not corporeal, correct? I see nothing in the definition of corporeal to suggest that these beings cannot have parts.
Wikipedia: "Incorporeal beings or objects are not made out of matter in the way a physical, material being or object exists."
As for photons, ions, etc, I suggest you take a look at String theory. Not very testable stuff, but intriguing nonetheless
If you admit that there is no evidence of God's existence, why are you so inclined to go on the feelings of people? What exactly can you surmise about the cause of an effect if there is no evidence to suggest that the cause exists in the first place. Are you putting God in the same place as the Invisible Pink Unicorn and the FSM...because I'd be right with you if you were.
So perhaps bringing us back to the original topic, given that you admit there is no evidence, what makes you believe? (this is just an honest question by the way, I don't think I've ever asked you before)
Wikipedia: "Incorporeal beings or objects are not made out of matter in the way a physical, material being or object exists."
As for photons, ions, etc, I suggest you take a look at String theory. Not very testable stuff, but intriguing nonetheless
If you admit that there is no evidence of God's existence, why are you so inclined to go on the feelings of people? What exactly can you surmise about the cause of an effect if there is no evidence to suggest that the cause exists in the first place. Are you putting God in the same place as the Invisible Pink Unicorn and the FSM...because I'd be right with you if you were.
So perhaps bringing us back to the original topic, given that you admit there is no evidence, what makes you believe? (this is just an honest question by the way, I don't think I've ever asked you before)
