Alleged Contradictions - Sabbath

[Tiberius]

So he reckons your "brief history" wasn't accurate. What exactly are you finding so funny about that? Why not instead of swearing at him and being rude, you back up your assertions with evidence?

If you are going to keep criticizing my posts why do you not read them or at least consider them more carefully?

My complaint - the reason I didn't take it seriously - is that josef questioned the Christian History, which had very little to do with anything in the first place, WITHOUT providing a reason for doing so or an alternative position.

How, or more importantly, why, would I respond to a baseless criticism? What would I say - "Uh, no. That's not true."

I thought the reason would have been obvious to you: He didn't think you were entirely accurate. You presented your opinion of what the interpretation of the Jesus lineage was, and he presented his alternative. This is what happens in discussions. You present an opinion; people talk about it; someone else points out some supposed flaws; you debate.

What you don't do is go "Are you serious?" and then rudely refuse to talk about anything related to what he brought up. If you want to be a part of this discussion, you'll have to respond to criticism...