RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
March 4, 2015 at 4:45 am
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2015 at 5:50 am by Huggy Bear.)
(March 4, 2015 at 1:59 am)SteelCurtain Wrote:(March 3, 2015 at 11:39 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You guys can ask Y/N questions, but can't answer them yourselves.
Pretty hypocritical, no?
What the actual fuck?
You're just trolling, now.
Imma drop the rest of this here, again. Please tell me how this is not answering your question.
(March 3, 2015 at 11:21 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Why do you insist on being a fucking liar? The question was:
How does my answer not directly address that question? Are you so obtuse that to you, a direct response to the question, not phrased in your false yes/no dichotomy, is not an answer? I refuse to believe that you are that dumb. But you are making it really fucking hard to hang on to that.
Literally "Are you saying this?" followed by "I am not saying this."
Direct question here: are you seriously saying that because I said "I am not" instead of "no," that you don't consider my answer, which literally directly answered your question, an answer?
First of all, I wasn't talking to you, that was directed at Esquilax.
Secondly, I explicitly stated "A yes or no answer will suffice", your answer of
(March 3, 2015 at 11:21 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I am not intimating that a planetary body cannot shift its orbit.Is not a clear yes or no. The word you used "intimating" meant to be purposefully vague.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intimate
Quote:intimate
: to say or suggest (something) in an indirect way
(March 4, 2015 at 2:47 am)Esquilax Wrote: I actually wouldn't be surprised if this is the case: I remember one of my first interactions with Huggy was on a certain rape-related issue in the bible, and his entire position was that no rape happened because the actual word "rape" was never used in the text, despite the context making it very clear what was happening.Now THAT is a bald faced lie.
Selective, ridiculous over-literalism is kinda his deal.
We already know you have a selective memory, how about providing the link to support to that claim?