(March 10, 2015 at 1:02 am)Esquilax Wrote: The FACTS of the case is that some people reported hearing a voice at a chaotic, stressful rescue scene. That's not what's under contention, and it's also not something I've taken issue with here.That's good because that is not what is being discussed. Because the voice heard was not heard at a rescue scene, it was heard at a low stress grizzley salvage scene. It did not become a rescue scene till the voice was heard.
Quote:Your completely unjustified assertion that the voice belonged to a guardian angel is what's problematic with this story, and that's truly something that doesn't fit with the FACTS of reality.Where have you been? I have conceeded the term 'Gaurdian angel' for "disembodied voice" like in my second post. Lax, if youre going to red herring your way into a conversation at least make sure it hasn't already been done.
Quote: You can grandstand all you like, but in truth you're just doing what you always do, and are arguing from ignorance: pointing at a mystery- more likely either someone else at the scene asking for help in an unrelated task or an auditory hallucination, which is the kind of thing that happens every day- and assuming that it's what you want it to be, because you said so, isn't much of a position.
But hey, you go back to being a complete slimeball, as I've seen from reading the rest of the thread. That's more your speed than producing accurate observations about reality.
As apposed to what your accurate observation about this thread?
I guess there is a good reason I have taken to calling you 'Lax.'
