Regarding the OP topic, perhaps it comes down to whether you think that the Christian position is rational, yet wrong or just plain irrational.
If you think Christianity is a rational (but wrong) worldview, uninformed arguments are a distraction and waste of everyone's time at best. You would like to intelligently debate the points perhaps because you like the debate itself, have a genuine interest in the subject, and/or other reasons.
If you believe the Christian position is irrational, then it seems that even stupid comments, observation or poor logic serves us right. You don't have to understand the Christian position because you presupposed it to be irrational and not worth your time (of course some will know more than others or perhaps think you know...). You feel free to add your voice to the chorus because it makes you feel good to be right. The more vitriolic the better. Like Dawkins says, “mock them, ridicule them, in public … with contempt,”.
If you think Christianity is a rational (but wrong) worldview, uninformed arguments are a distraction and waste of everyone's time at best. You would like to intelligently debate the points perhaps because you like the debate itself, have a genuine interest in the subject, and/or other reasons.
If you believe the Christian position is irrational, then it seems that even stupid comments, observation or poor logic serves us right. You don't have to understand the Christian position because you presupposed it to be irrational and not worth your time (of course some will know more than others or perhaps think you know...). You feel free to add your voice to the chorus because it makes you feel good to be right. The more vitriolic the better. Like Dawkins says, “mock them, ridicule them, in public … with contempt,”.