Evie-- thank you for your short glib answers.
Each argument contains premises built on evidence and observations. A conclusion can be drawn. It may not even be a certainty--perhaps just a preponderance of the evidence. Note the word evidence used several times.
Noting that there have been thousands of books on a subject is not an argument from authority. I was perhaps unclear in my meaning of my sentence. I was pointing out that unless you have read extensively on the subject and have some new insight previously not thought of, you saying so does not solve the debate.
I have heard of evolution. Have they figured out the origin of life and irreducible complexity yet? How about how/why consciousness exists.
What miracles lack evidence? Are you saying that there never what a miracle? How do you know that?
Each argument contains premises built on evidence and observations. A conclusion can be drawn. It may not even be a certainty--perhaps just a preponderance of the evidence. Note the word evidence used several times.
Noting that there have been thousands of books on a subject is not an argument from authority. I was perhaps unclear in my meaning of my sentence. I was pointing out that unless you have read extensively on the subject and have some new insight previously not thought of, you saying so does not solve the debate.
I have heard of evolution. Have they figured out the origin of life and irreducible complexity yet? How about how/why consciousness exists.
What miracles lack evidence? Are you saying that there never what a miracle? How do you know that?
