RE: Why make stupid unsustainable arguments?
December 9, 2015 at 10:19 pm
(This post was last modified: December 9, 2015 at 10:20 pm by Mr.wizard.)
(December 9, 2015 at 10:08 pm)SteveII Wrote:(December 9, 2015 at 9:47 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote: No the logical approach is to follow the evidence, your making up the answers you want to choose from, how is that not presuppositional?
Thank you for a reasonable discussion.
Putting God in the pool of explanatory options is not presupposing anything. You are free to debate the premises all you want. If you want to see them properly formatted and discussed with quotes from Dawkins etc., you can see several of them here .
Yes it is because you haven't established that god exists yet, that is what your premises are supposed to prove. Kalam doesn't prove god it builds an argument around the assumption that god already exists and assumes his capabilities. You can not make an argument for god being a cause for anything until you establish that he actually exists.