(December 9, 2015 at 8:58 pm)SteveII Wrote:(December 9, 2015 at 8:46 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: Is it your contention that these arguments should be persuasive in all cases? Or do you acknowledge that the wish to believe such things is also required?
My contention is that this list makes belief in God reasonable and rational. Once you have moved belief in God to rational, you can investigate various theologies and see which one (if any) makes sense of the data and experiences we have.
It is kind of cute that you are so concerned to establish that your belief in a god doesn't make you a total nut case. It is neither reasonable nor rational to either believe in the existence or non-existence of gods. No reasoning supports either position because it is poorly defined silly stuff for which no means exists to demonstrate either position.
Why should anyone worry about such matters?