RE: Why make stupid unsustainable arguments?
December 11, 2015 at 1:32 pm
(This post was last modified: December 11, 2015 at 1:33 pm by Cato.)
(December 11, 2015 at 1:10 pm)athrock Wrote: I realize it was not your intention to open a huge can of worms, but when you make positive statements like this, you are obligated to provide a supporting argument or be relegated to the category of background chatter.
No supporting argument is required. As a species we observe existence with our five senses and have developed the ability to extend the powers of these senses through technology. No matter where we look, listen, taste, touch or smell there is no evidence for god. I can easily be proved wrong through simple demonstration. If there were any evidence, atheists would have it constantly shoved down our collective throat, but this never happens; never.
(December 11, 2015 at 1:10 pm)athrock Wrote: Who calls the Big Bang "god"? Not theists or atheists from what I've read. That would be akin to calling the the telephone the inventor instead of the invention. Precision is important here. Believers claim that God caused the Big Bang...it did not cause itself.
Precision is important here, but it is you who is lacking the attention to detail. I claimed that people call the CAUSE of the Big Bang god; a point you agree with in your last sentence.
