(December 13, 2015 at 1:35 pm)Cato Wrote:(December 13, 2015 at 11:50 am)athrock Wrote: Consequently, skeptics ignore these arguments at THEIR peril.
You've already been shown how long these arguments and their refutations have existed. I understand this is new to you and you seem enamored and convinced, but there's nothing to be seen here that most of us haven't already considered. Peril? You have grossly exaggerated the efficacy of your claims. There's nothing perilous in these arguments to an atheist's position. You would do yourself a tremendous service if you finished reading about these arguments at the link I provided.
My position is to be unimpressed with the cogency of the case made thus far for the existence of gods. Should the missing evidence appear, my position wouldn't be 'imperiled', it would merely become informed by that evidence. But arguments of a general/logical nature based on the meaning of words will never add up to anything approaching evidence. So nothing new, nothing imperiled. Got any other tricks?