Why make stupid unsustainable arguments?

[athrock]

Consequently, skeptics ignore these arguments at THEIR peril.

You've already been shown how long these arguments and their refutations have existed. I understand this is new to you and you seem enamored and convinced, but there's nothing to be seen here that most of us haven't already considered. Peril? You have grossly exaggerated the efficacy of your claims. There's nothing perilous in these arguments to an atheist's position. You would do yourself a tremendous service if you finished reading about these arguments at the link I provided.

My claims? I didn't come up with this stuff.

But actually, I have been reading, Cato. Surely you must know that refutations of the refutations have also been around for a long time.

Clearly, if theists had NO good arguments, the party would have been over for them long ago, wouldn't it?

This is like Obama calling ISIS the "JV team";  the potency of the opposition is being vastly underrated, IMO.