Debate: God Exists

[SuperSentient]

You can't be this dense

So lets back up the argument to what started all of this: "Your claim that Christianity is like every other in that all God interact with their followers." Then I corrected your statement several times as you've been trying to find a loop hole. You did and still seem unaware that IF say a Muslim 'spoke to allah' then they would be elevating themselves above the status of the prophet Mohammad, or they would be guilty of blaspheme.

So back to How do we know Christianity is true? because it places the individual/follower before God himself. This claim has been vetted by the population of Christian believers at large for over 2000 years. This process is not hidden to anyone, and everyone is welcome.

Simple fallacy. The views of a religion wouldn't have impact on objective truth. Speaking to Allah is not necessarily elevating above Muhammed in Islam, many Muslims believe they do, just like many Christians. You are trying to define Christianity into objective truth, which you can't do.

Citations please. I think you 'feel' that you are right but never researched it. What you fail to understand is to claim contact with God in other religions is a death sentence in most cases.

Again as only prophets can make this claim. As I exampled above To make this claim in most if not all other religions even Judaism is blaspheme and a death sentence follows.

I gave you one source, but I will give another source for individual experience. I have met muslims that claim to speak to Allah, it isn't something new.
http://islam.stackexchange.com/questions...e-directly

I'm not talking about prayer. If you have a friendship do you pray to your friend? If you have a mentor do you always pray or speak in prayer to him?

This is what prayer has been about (talking to God), and it is a major pillar of Christianity. 

No I challenged God in the and He said to challenge Him and I found the Truth.

But you certainly assume God exists, this has been demonstrated by what I said to you earlier.

The quoted bit says the exact oppsite of your intended meaning. It says Under God we are free from the laws of religion.

This quote demonstrates what I meant:

That makes the bible, and our 'testimonies' not an argument for God, but apart of the map to find God. 

Yes I have proof of God's existance, how many times must i say YES!

So now then do you have proof He does not exist???

If you are positing that something exists, shouldn't a burden of proof be on you rather than the person denying it?
I actually do have "proofs" of God's non-existence, I have manually constructed them (many from other ideas) and are still working to have a complete set. 
However, by what you say, it seems it doesn't interest you to be open minded.