(December 30, 2022 at 11:36 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Do you have anything to say about the number density of distant radio sources, or are you trying to rehabilitate your/Lehrners hogwash?
What is your reply to the falsification based on this? Thats the only relevant issue on the conversation between the two of us.
Also:
Wtf are you doing on an atheist forum? Did they laugh you out of all the astrophysicist forums?
Nope, we have at least three completely independent methods of measurement that all match the BBT.
Did you lie, or was that your ignorance speaking?
But to shortly address your deflection:
Are you really so ignorant to not see the faulty thinking of yours?
I am just asking to offer you a way out of this corner you have painted yourself into, before you humiliate yourself further.
Back to number density of distant radio sources? Got something, anything?
Oh no why don't you tell me about this 'number density of distant radio sources' and why its the hail mary that proves the BBT. :T
