RE: Damned Muslims
April 13, 2017 at 4:19 pm
(This post was last modified: April 13, 2017 at 4:22 pm by WinterHold.)
Just saw this topic!
First; I have to do the sacred chant:
-Kill Kill ! Muzlim nuke! nuke em Muz!
Kill Kill!
Alalala boom
*Everybody dies*
-------------------
Now; seriously saying:
Courts mean nothing. Judges also mean nothing if the sentenced person doesn't agree. In other words; compulsion is not allowed.
-A court that orders the killing of a homosexual is obsolete if the gay person doesn't agree on the sentence.
-A court that orders the killing of a blasphemer is obsolete; if the blasphemer doesn't agree on the sentence.
-A court that allows a husband to beat his wife is obsolete; if the wife doesn't agree on the sentence.
-... so on ; with any controversial sentence...
It is only legal if the convict agrees on the legitimacy of the court in the first place.
But in crimes like:
-Murder
-Theft
-Rape
-...so on...-
Vengeance is sentenced usually, and courts almost everywhere in the world force the sentence on the convict, sometimes execution is the hammer fallen on the convict, many execute by locking the convict in a concrete box for long years, some prefer to cut the hand of the convict, or lash him 100 times.
In a Muslim society, the people by the right of freedom God gave to humanity, have the right to rule and judge by the heavenly constitution called "the Quran".
It has a set of sentences that include:
-Cutting the hand of the thief
-Treating the eye for an eye
-Lashing people who have sex without a legal contract called "marriage" with a 100 lashes. Bastards everywhere ruin society and raise crime rates; also kids without parents end up like Silent Hill 4's Walter. Bareback is better than condom.
-A husband can beat his wife if she beat him; eye for an eye; slap for a slap; but he also has the right to forgive.
-A wife can beat the husband if he beat her; eye for an eye; slap for a slap; but she has the right to forgive.
-...So on ...
Evidence:
Sura 2, page 42, The Quran
( 256 ) There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.
Sura 5, page 115, The Quran
( 45 ) And We ordained for them therein a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds is legal retribution. But whoever gives [up his right as] charity, it is an expiation for him. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the wrongdoers.
Ask Pakistan's government, or Saudi Arabia's government, or Iran's government, or the UAE government, where these disgusting sentences for personal freedom come from. It's the Hadith books which allows such terrible contradictory laws to be taken into consideration.
Nobody rules with the Quran. Track these wicked sentences, they don't exist in the Quran.
It's the Hadith that is behind this disgusting mentality.
An atheists might be a non believer. But a hypocrite Muslim who allowed books written by man to replace the verses of God is far more worse. Far far worse.
First; I have to do the sacred chant:
-Kill Kill ! Muzlim nuke! nuke em Muz!
Kill Kill!
Alalala boom
*Everybody dies*
-------------------
Now; seriously saying:
Courts mean nothing. Judges also mean nothing if the sentenced person doesn't agree. In other words; compulsion is not allowed.
-A court that orders the killing of a homosexual is obsolete if the gay person doesn't agree on the sentence.
-A court that orders the killing of a blasphemer is obsolete; if the blasphemer doesn't agree on the sentence.
-A court that allows a husband to beat his wife is obsolete; if the wife doesn't agree on the sentence.
-... so on ; with any controversial sentence...
It is only legal if the convict agrees on the legitimacy of the court in the first place.
But in crimes like:
-Murder
-Theft
-Rape
-...so on...-
Vengeance is sentenced usually, and courts almost everywhere in the world force the sentence on the convict, sometimes execution is the hammer fallen on the convict, many execute by locking the convict in a concrete box for long years, some prefer to cut the hand of the convict, or lash him 100 times.
In a Muslim society, the people by the right of freedom God gave to humanity, have the right to rule and judge by the heavenly constitution called "the Quran".
It has a set of sentences that include:
-Cutting the hand of the thief
-Treating the eye for an eye
-Lashing people who have sex without a legal contract called "marriage" with a 100 lashes. Bastards everywhere ruin society and raise crime rates; also kids without parents end up like Silent Hill 4's Walter. Bareback is better than condom.
-A husband can beat his wife if she beat him; eye for an eye; slap for a slap; but he also has the right to forgive.
-A wife can beat the husband if he beat her; eye for an eye; slap for a slap; but she has the right to forgive.
-...So on ...
Evidence:
Sura 2, page 42, The Quran
( 256 ) There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.
Sura 5, page 115, The Quran
( 45 ) And We ordained for them therein a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and for wounds is legal retribution. But whoever gives [up his right as] charity, it is an expiation for him. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the wrongdoers.
Ask Pakistan's government, or Saudi Arabia's government, or Iran's government, or the UAE government, where these disgusting sentences for personal freedom come from. It's the Hadith books which allows such terrible contradictory laws to be taken into consideration.
Nobody rules with the Quran. Track these wicked sentences, they don't exist in the Quran.
It's the Hadith that is behind this disgusting mentality.
An atheists might be a non believer. But a hypocrite Muslim who allowed books written by man to replace the verses of God is far more worse. Far far worse.