RE: "Jesus would rather kill, not marry, gay people" - Franklin Graham
July 16, 2018 at 7:10 pm
(This post was last modified: July 16, 2018 at 7:57 pm by Amarok.)
(July 16, 2018 at 5:55 pm)Cecelia Wrote: It's absolutely clear that SteveII has zero clue how the US constitution works.I wonder if he would be this keen if America were a majority Anti Theist
Democratically, laws cannot be passed that go against the constitution. I highly recommend taking a remedial course in US Government in order to correct your flawed understanding of the US constitution and the Supreme Court. Banning Same Sex Marriage is a violation of the United States Constitution -- namely a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment of the United States. Your lack of understanding does NOT mean that you get to go around calling people who disagree with you on court cases 'Judicial Activists". The judicial activists on that court were the ones who sided with YOUR Side and against the constitution. Wanting to allow laws that go against the constitution because it's in alignment with their personal beliefs. We don't base laws in this country over a bunch of fairy tales written by neanderthals. We base them on the US constitution. Again, I highly recommend a remedial course in US Civics so that you can educate yourself.
(July 16, 2018 at 6:47 pm)Astreja Wrote:True not all Christians are regressive bigots so better we say Steve and roads interpretation is hateful because it makes marriage exclusive and makes a loving monogamous relationship between consenting adults equivalent to adultery . Just like in some interpretations of Islam marrying a Christian is seen the same both are hateful .(July 16, 2018 at 3:14 pm)SteveII Wrote: You have said that the belief is hateful, but you just admitted that it is not.
Stop prooftexting me. Not all Christians see homosexuality as sinful, and as anyone can tell if they read the your link, I specifically referenced the "homosexuality is sinful" belief. It is not universal in Christianity.
How do you suppose your LGBT friends would feel if they knew how you felt about gay marriage? If they don't know now, I think they should find out so that they can make an informed choice about whether or not to continue the friendship.
(July 16, 2018 at 5:55 pm)Cecelia Wrote: It's absolutely clear that SteveII has zero clue how the US constitution works.Indeed DOMA was unconstitutional as are same sex marriage bans no matter if states vote on it .
Democratically, laws cannot be passed that go against the constitution. I highly recommend taking a remedial course in US Government in order to correct your flawed understanding of the US constitution and the Supreme Court. Banning Same Sex Marriage is a violation of the United States Constitution -- namely a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment of the United States. Your lack of understanding does NOT mean that you get to go around calling people who disagree with you on court cases 'Judicial Activists". The judicial activists on that court were the ones who sided with YOUR Side and against the constitution. Wanting to allow laws that go against the constitution because it's in alignment with their personal beliefs. We don't base laws in this country over a bunch of fairy tales written by neanderthals. We base them on the US constitution. Again, I highly recommend a remedial course in US Civics so that you can educate yourself.
(July 16, 2018 at 5:55 pm)Cecelia Wrote: It's absolutely clear that SteveII has zero clue how the US constitution works.It didn't just violate the 14th DOMA violated the 5th
Democratically, laws cannot be passed that go against the constitution. I highly recommend taking a remedial course in US Government in order to correct your flawed understanding of the US constitution and the Supreme Court. Banning Same Sex Marriage is a violation of the United States Constitution -- namely a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment of the United States. Your lack of understanding does NOT mean that you get to go around calling people who disagree with you on court cases 'Judicial Activists". The judicial activists on that court were the ones who sided with YOUR Side and against the constitution. Wanting to allow laws that go against the constitution because it's in alignment with their personal beliefs. We don't base laws in this country over a bunch of fairy tales written by neanderthals. We base them on the US constitution. Again, I highly recommend a remedial course in US Civics so that you can educate yourself.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb